whenever create multi column table in wysiwyg, first column extends beyond width specified. e.g
even if specify 1px or 1% width extends 90% of total width. no matter content enter,when th cant control width when displayed on site
anyone ideas?
regards,
jim mccann
a table 1 row , 3 columns should behave way want
2 or more rows content in columns of other rows affect width of other rows.
another thing might interfering settings table in template_css.css. css styles override settings in html code.
cheers
Popular posts from this blog
hi, i want install mambelfish 1.5 component in joomla! 1.0.4 stable [ sundial ] site, reason following error: failed create directory "/home/virtual/site13/fst/var/www/html/components/com_mambelfish/" i new joomla! , still not familiar it. great if build multilingual sites using joomla!. just clarify... media/ writeable administrator/components/ writeable components/ writeable images/stories/ writeable how install component? use upload package file or use install directory ? Board index Joomla! Older Version Support Joomla! 1.0 Extensions - 1.0.x Components
i'd store 4 digit passcode eeprom. i'm thinking of doing following: code: [select] char passcode[4] = eeprom.read(1, 2, 3, 4) does make sense? is there simple way read eeprom directly array? quote does make sense? yes. work? no. quote is there simple way read eeprom directly array? use loop read value each element of array. Arduino Forum > Forum 2005-2010 (read only) > Software > Syntax & Programs > Using EEPROM to store an array arduino
basically little observation made when accessing arrays out of sequence. i had inside isr, , affected performance worse. found pretty strange code little bit of isr. tried have array element 2 @ top (not important @ of course). code: [select] for ( int x=0 ; x<4 ; x++ ) { for ( int y=0 ; y<4 ; y++ ) { int cx = x+1; int cy = y+1; int fivecy = 4 - y; // 5-cy face[2][x][y] = cube[cx][fivecy][0]; // top (face 2) face[0][x][y] = cube[5][cx][cy]; face[1][x][y] = cube[cx][0][cy]; face[3][x][y] = cube[0][cx][fivecy]; face[4][x][y] = cube[fivecy][5][5-cx]; face[5][x][y] = cube[cx][cy][5]; // bottom (face 5) } } putting in sequence made faster again. thought wouldn't matter, guess compiler optimizations when arrays accessed in sequence? i have since optimized isr ~40% latency, these 2 versions (array in sequence vs out-of-sequence), had latency of 53 timer2 clock cycles (86% latency) , (see...
Comments
Post a Comment